Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 So. 3d 753 - Johnson v. State

40 So. 3d 753 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘(1) [T]he background, experience and conduct of the defendant including his age, educational back ground, and his physical and mental health; (2) the extent to which the [appellant] had contact with lawyers prior to the [appeal]; (3) the defendant’s knowledge of the nature of the charges, the possible defenses, and the possible penalty; (4) the defendant’s understanding of the rules of procedure, evidence and courtroom decorum; (5) the defendant’s experience in criminal trials; (6) ... whether the waiver of counsel was the result of mistreatment or coercion; or ([7]) whether the defendant was trying to manipulate the events of the [appeal].’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.