Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 SW3D 650 - Robuck v. State

Robuck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Guzman v. State · Helms v. State · Young v. State · Mayfield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No facts were contained in the affidavit that would support a conclusion that contraband or evidence of a crime would be found at Robuck’s residence. The only statement contained in the affidavit that relates to Robuck’s residence is the generalized assertion that quantities of currency and other evidence documents would be constantly maintained at Ro-buck’s residence given his long term involvement in the drug trade. This statement is too general to support the issuance of a search warrant for Ro-buck’s residence. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.