Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 SW3D 698 - Burks v. State

Burks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Allen v. State · Drone v. State · Bell v. State · Owens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another, or to make the declarant an object of hatred, ridicule, or disgrace, that a reasonable person in declarant's position would not have made the statement unless believing it to be true. In criminal cases, a statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in the context of the declarant's social interests”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.