Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 SW3D 873 - Brown v. Commonwealth

Brown v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1671 · 15 U.S.C. § 1673

Relies on Caminetti v. United States · Kokoszka v. Belford · Bailey v. Reeves · Usery v. First National Bank of Arizona · Ready v. Jamison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he limited protection afforded by [Kentucky's wage garnishment statute] encourages debtors and creditors alike to consider the long-term ramifications of [an execution against a bank account]. Thus, both the creditor and the debtor must decide whether they would not be better off in the long run if the debtor was not forced into bankruptcy ... but was instead encouraged to continue working and steadily repaying his debts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(5) If the court finds that the garnishee was, at the time of service of the order upon him, possessed of any property of the judgment debtor, or was indebted to him, and the property or debt is not exempt from execution, the court shall order the property or the proceeds of the debt applied upon the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.