Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Tex. Civ. App. 137 - Arthur v. Ridge

40 Tex. Civ. App. 137 - Arthur v. Ridge’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1953
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1953

13 state decisions

50190519101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is generally true that some sort of possession is required to authorize the presumption of a grant, and when the court indulges the presumption as matter of law it is perhaps invariably required. But, where the issue is one of fact for the jury, it is not perceived why the execution of a conveyance may not be established by circumstances as any other fact the existence of which a jury may be called upon to determine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.