Liebhant v. Lawrence’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1997
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parsons v. Weis · Ricketson v. Richardson · Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal. · State ex rel. Happel v. District Court · Dunlap v. Steere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As frequently stated by the courts, a plaintiff who seeks to avail himself of the statutory mode [or Rule 4(g) ] for a constructive service of summons must exercise good faith in his representations to the court or judge. A presentation of a willfully false affidavit, for the purpose of obtaining an order for service of the summons by publication, is itself an act of fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.