Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Va. App. 639 - Thomas v. Thomas

40 Va. App. 639 - Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2021

16 state decisions

90200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 20 Va. App. 133 - Sandoval v. Commonwealth · 58 Md. App. 386 - Sharp v. Sharp · 15 Va. App. 395 - Alphin v. Alphin · 29 Va. App. 673 - Anderson v. Anderson · 4 Va. App. 113 - Mitchell v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he court, upon request of either party, (i) shall determine the legal title as between the parties, and the ownership and value of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, of the parties and shall consider which of such property is separate property, which is marital property, and which is part separate and part marital property in accordance with subdivision A3.... The court shall determine the value of any such property as of the date of the evidentiary hearing on the evaluation issue.... Upon motion of either party made no less than 21 days before the evidentiary hearing the court may, for good cause shown, in order to attain the ends of justice, order that a different valuation date be used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.