40 Va. App. 648 - Perez v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lilly v. Virginia · Watkins v. Virginia · Watkins v. Commonwealth · 26 Va. App. 299 - Ohree v. Commonwealth · Barrett v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We open a Pandora's box of subjective hindsight if appellate review of juror selection is based on first-time, post-trial conjecture as to what does or does not constitute appropriate `integrity of the process' to a majority of the appellate court hearing the argument years after the fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Townsend v. Com.“Upon familiar principles, we will not reverse the denial of a motion for a mistrial unless a manifest probability exists that the trial court's ruling was prejudicial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.