Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 VACIR 419 - Gray v. Commonwealth

Gray v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on James v. Jane · Messina v. Burden · Gargiulo v. Ohar · Heider v. Clemons · Lohr v. Larsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While it is clear that nurses very often use judgment and discretion in their duties day-to-day ... there is no evidence concerning whether any discretion was being used by them when the negligent act complained of occurred. The nurses have admitted they acted without authority in [the act alleged]. This admission suggests that the order was given for the proper administration and it was simply not followed. Placing the line in the wrong blood vessel is a rather simple, direct act which appears ministerial and as such is not entitled to protection by sovereign immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.