Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Wash. App. 658 - State v. Walker

40 Wash. App. 658 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2013

17 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow · 98 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. McCullum · 101 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Allery · 101 Wash. 2d 612 - State v. Acosta · 99 Wash. 2d 95 - Thomas v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That the defendant is a victim of a battering relation ship is riot alone sufficient evidence to submit the issue of self-defense to a jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The evidence must establish a confrontation or conflict, not instigated or provoked by the defendant, which would induce a reasonable person, considering all the facts and circumstances known to the defendant, to believe that there was imminent danger of great bodily harm about to be inflicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]ome evidence of aggressive or threatening behavior, gestures, or communication by the victim before defendant's use of force ... to show that the defendant had reasonable grounds to believe there was imminent danger of great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.