Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 40 Wash. App. 749 - State v. Frederiksen

40 Wash. App. 749 - State v. Frederiksen’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2023

19 state decisions

12019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · United States v. Unicorn Enterprises, Inc. · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. · United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when the case carries racial overtones; (2) when the case involves other matters (e.g., the insanity defense) concerning which either the local community or the population at large is commonly known to harbor strong feelings that may stop short of presumptive bias in law yet significantly skew deliberations in fact.; and (3) when the case involves other forms of bias and distorting influence which have become evident through experience with juries (e.g., the tendency to overvalue official government agents’ testimony.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he trial court is vested with discretion (1) to see that the voir dire is effective in obtaining an impartial jury and (2) to see that this result is obtained with reasonable expedition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]bsent an abuse of discretion and a showing that the accused's rights have been substantially prejudiced thereby.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.