40 Wash. App. 835 - State v. WS’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 736 - DuPont-Fort Lewis School District No. 7 v. Bruno · 88 Wash. 2d 799 - Purse Seine Vessel Owners Ass'n v. Moos · 25 Wash. App. 377 - State v. Norton · 28 Wash. App. 580 - State v. Chatham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This is not to say that all prostitutes must be accepted by a diversionary unit or even that WS must necessarily be accepted by the diversionary unit but, rather, that a denial based on the crime itself is arbitrary when it is clear that the Legislature intended such crimes as appropriate for diversion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pulfrey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.