40 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
November 1979
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Henry v. United States · Fixa v. Heilberg · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley · Huebner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . A trial court has power to try cases together when the defendants are charged with the same offenses arising out of the same transaction and provable by the same evidence.’ . . .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““'. . . The central idea of an arrest is the taking- or detaining of a person by word or action in custody so as to subject his liberty to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest. . . . But there must exist the intent to take into custody and a corresponding understanding by the person arrested that he is in “custody,” although no formal declaration of arrest is required.’ ” 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.