In Re Brooks-Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · In Re Robert J Snyder · Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that subdivision (b) has been violated, the court may, subject to the conditions stated below, impose an appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have violated subdivision (b) or are responsible for the violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Dobbs“we do not have the power or authority to ignore binding Ninth Circuit or Supreme Court precedent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.