Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 F.2d 231 - Irving v. Breazeale

Irving v. Breazeale’s Empirical Analysis

400 F.2d 231 · 1968

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Burdine v. Johnson (2001), Boyer v. City of Orlando (1968)

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1901968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois · Witherspoon v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “you have the right to a lawyer.” There is no evidence that Benavides is a dull adult, and the fact that he does not speak English is the reason there is a court interpreter. There is also no indication that he did not understand that his right to counsel was unqualified. While the magistrate judge's statements fell short of the requirements of Rule 11(b)(1)(D) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 11(h) provides that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is not enough for the trial Court to ask an indigent defendant merely whether he desires counsel: the Court must affirmatively inform the defendant that it has a duty to appoint counsel for him if he so desires.” Id. at 260 . This language is dicta. Elsperman's holding is that the habeas petitioner was entitled to a hearing on his”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.