Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

400 F.2d 360

Docket No. 22276.

Vern Leroy Stover, and v. United States of America, And

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-09-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on Haynes v. United States · Pierson v. Ray · Forgett v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-09-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 1981

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

90196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Vern L. Stover, in pro. per.

Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., M. L. Morehouse, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and CROCKER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

On February 19, 1964, appellant was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment for bank robbery. He could have received twenty years. The district judge here has specified that the ten years was in addition to the 69 days spent in jail after arrest and before sentence. Stover wants credit for the 69 days on the 10 year sentence.

¶2

Stapf v. United States, 125 U.S.App. D.C. 100, 367 F.2d 326, and Dunn v. United States, 4 Cir., 376 F.2d 191, really support the goverment on the facts here. They are of no use in this case to the petitioner.

¶3

Order affirmed.

/400/f2d/360 · .json · Public domain