Moreno v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis
400 F.3d 1152 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Terry v. Ohio · Anderson v. Creighton · Morrissey v. Brewer · Mitchell v. Forsyth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consistently recognized that there is no ‘constitutional difference between probation and parole for purposes of the fourth amendment.’ ” Motley, 432 F.3d at 1083 n. 9 (quoting Moreno v. Baca, 400 F.3d 1152 , 1168 n. 12 (9th Cir.2005)). 4 . Although the district court found it relevant that the officers here were not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Sanchez v. Canales“`constitutional difference between probation and parole for purposes of the fourth amendment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Motley“[In Kincade ], we were unable to resolve the proper test to be applied....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nicholas v. Goord
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.