Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 F.3d 1206 - Thomas v. Fry's Electronics, Inc.

Thomas v. Fry's Electronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

400 F.3d 1206 · 2005

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
October 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA · United States of America Ex El Margaret Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Swierkiewicz merely stands for the proposition that federal courts may not impose a heightened pleading requirement in derogation of federal notice pleading rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “California anti-SLAPP motions to strike and entitlement to fees and costs are available to litigants proceeding in federal court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.