Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 F.3d 1282 - Kelley v. Hicks

Kelley v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

400 F.3d 1282 · 2005

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Helling v. McKinney · Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc. · Farrow v. West · Hill v. Dekalb Regional Youth Detention Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A serious medical need is one that has been diagnosed by a physician as mandating treatment or one that is so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor’s attention. In the alternative, a serious medical need is determined by whether a delay in treating the need worsens the condition. In either case, the medical need must be one that, if left unattended, poses a substantial risk of serious harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.