Pham v. Ca Terhune’s Empirical Analysis
400 F.3d 740 · 2005
Citation profile
54
cited by 54 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Ylst v. Nunnemaker · Harris v. Nelson · Bracy v. Gramley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“perform an `independent review of the record' to ascertain whether the state court decision was objectively unreasonable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to expand the COA by presenting uncertified issues, under a separate heading , in his opening brief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waters v. Lockett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.