Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

400 F. App'x 769

Howard v. Ozmint

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-10-27

Relies on Houston v. Lack

Decided 2010-10-27

¶1Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Stacy W. Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because Howard is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The record does not reveal when Howard gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

¶4 REMANDED.

/400/fappx/769 · .json · Public domain