400 F. Supp. 970 - Lowe v. Hopper’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Harris v. United States · McDonald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden is on the government to show that the search is within one of the exceptions to the warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment. (Citations omitted; emphasis added.) [T]he test is a . . . subjective one. The “real purpose” of the inspection must be inventorial and nonpretextuous with an unexpected result insofar as turning up evidence is concerned. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Manus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.