Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 N.E.2d 1149 - Barr v. State

Barr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 1993
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 168 Ind. App. 336 - Hale v. Peabody Coal Company · 177 Ind. App. 74 - Gonser v. Bd. of Com'rs for Owen Cty. · 173 Ind. App. 218 - Board of Directors of Big Raccoon Conservancy District v. Kessler Farms Corp. · 181 Ind. App. 295 - Tekulve v. Turner · 173 Ind. App. 208 - Palmer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is also the responsibility of an appellate court to make its determination from a reading of the statute in its entirety, rather than giving a strict and literal meaning to any particular section." (Citations omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A summary judgment is rendered when after reviewing all the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file along with affidavits and testimony, there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 56(c). On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, the only issues are whether the trial court correctly applied the law and whether there is a genuine issue of material fact. Tekulve v. Turner, (1979) Ind.App., 391 N.E.2d 673 . In addition, any doubt as to the existence of a genuine issue of material fact must be resolved against the moving party. Hale v. Peabody Coal Company, (1976) Ind. App., 343 N.E.2d 316 . Further, even where the facts are not disputed, summary judgment is improper where there may be disagreements as to the inferences to be drawn from these facts. Palmer v. State, (1977) Ind.App., 363 N.E.2d 1245 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"That section [IND.CODE 1-1-9-1] only lists those days that are considered legal holidays with the state and nowhere grants employees the right of additional compensation for wages on those days."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.