Hott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1464
Relies on Roth v. United States · Cohen v. California · Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation · Hess v. Indiana · United States v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whoever, by means of a telephone, (a) makes any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent; (b) or makes a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, molest or harass any person at the called number . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hott v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.