Frappier v. Eastern Logistics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
4 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Peacock v. Thomas · Nieder v. Royal Indemnity Insurance · MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. Eggleston · Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc. · Newman v. Stocker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Division's jurisdiction over coverage disputes is, however, ancillary to its jurisdiction over the underlying claim. Sherwood, supra, 246 N.J.Super. at 534-36 [ 588 A. 2d 399 ], see also 9 Larson's Workers' Compensation Laws § 150.04 (2007). The Division's authority to decide questions of coverage is the authority "to decide whether the carrier covers the claim." Williams, supra, 51 N.J. at 153 [ 238 A. 2d 177 ]. In order for the Division to exercise that authority, there must be [1] a statutory basis for the exercise of jurisdiction over the claim that is the subject of the coverage dispute, and [2] the coverage dispute must be related to that claim. Ibid.; see generally Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349, 356 , 116 S.Ct. 862, 868 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 817 (1996) (noting that a federal court exercising its statutorily granted supplemental jurisdiction "must have jurisdiction over a case or controversy before it may assert jurisdiction over ancillary claims"). [(Emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] person who is an `employee' is entitled to workers' compensation, and a person who is an `independent contractor' is not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.