Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 P.2d 463 - Allen v. State

Allen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1994

10 state decisions

501965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 96 Okla. Crim. 231 - Traxler v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 228 - Saltsman v. State · 61 Okla. Crim. 298 - Leary v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 269 - Padgett v. State · Cofer v. Oklahoma City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that an original arrest may have been unlawful does not affect the jurisdiction of the court, and it does not preclude trial of the accused for the offense.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Walters v. State · Harrison v. State
  2. ““When a person accused of crime is held under valid process in the proper forum, such detention is not rendered invalid because of the illegality of the events which preceded, or which made the detention physically possible. His wrong against the State holding him is not to be condoned because of the illegality of the means employed in obtaining custody.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Walters v. State
  3. ““Where an accused is physically before the court upon a criminal charge, either because he is held in custody after an arrest or because he has appeared in person after giving bail, the invalidity of the original arrest is immaterial as regards the jurisdiction of the court to proceed with the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Walters v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.