Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 P2D 64 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
5
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2005

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

5019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 85 Okla. Crim. 439 - Fields v. State · 80 Okla. Crim. 328 - Jenkins v. State · 5 Okla. Crim. 75 - Mulkey v. State · 30 Okla. Crim. 224 - Exleton v. State · 9 Okla. Crim. 84 - Wadsworth v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First: The witnesses must be examined in the presence of the defendant, and may be cross-examined by him. On the request of the county attorney, or the defendant, all the testimony must be reduced to writing in the form of questions and answers and signed by the witnesses, or the same may be taken in shorthand and transcribed without signing, and in both cases filed with the clerk of the district court, by the examining magistrate, and may be used as provided in 22 O.S.1951 § 333. In no case shall the county be liable for the expense in reducing such testimony to writing, unless ordered by the judge of a court of record.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[The] additional element of communication is unnecessary; for the question is what the deceased probably did, not what the defendant probably thought the deceased was going to do. The inquiry is one of objective occurrence, not of subjective belief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘It is not an essential prerequisite that a transcript of the evidence taken at a preliminary trial be filed with the court clerk in order to render it admissible in evidence, when otherwise competent and material.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.