Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 P3D 358 - Carrier v. State

Carrier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lopez-Medina · Lancaster v. State · Wilks v. State · Hodges v. State · Guy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The prosecutor may argue all reasonable inferences from evidence in the record. It is unprofessional conduct for the prosecutor intentionally to misstate the evidence or mislead the jury as to the inferences it may draw. (b) It is unprofessional conduct for the prosecutor to express his or her personal belief or opinion as to the truth or falsity of any testimony or evidence [of] the guilt of the defendant. (c) The prosecutor should not use arguments calculated to inflame the passions or prejudices of the jury. (d) The prosecutor should refrain from argument which would divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence, by injecting issues broader than the guilt or innocence of the accused under the controlling law, or by making predictions of the consequences of the jury's verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We are reluctant to find plain error in closing arguments lest the trial court becomes required to control argument because opposing counsel does not object.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.