Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 SO2D 1042 - Dedmon v. State

Dedmon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · United States v. Bowdach · 368 So. 2d 1278 - Menendez v. State · United States v. Baker · McGeehan v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consolidation of the two counts presented the most practical and efficient method of processing the case because the evidence of possession was intertwined and a part of the evidence of the act of shooting. There was no reason to have duplicative proceedings. Further, the potential for prejudice was minimized by the stipulation entered into by the parties in which the jury was told that [ Dedmon ] had been previously convicted of a felony insofar as it related to the possession count but the prior crime was not named. In addition, when we consider the eyewitness testimony, [ Dedmon's ] admissions, and the evidence connecting [ Dedmon ] with the weapon used in the crime, we can see no prejudicial effect on the jury with regard to the attempted murder count in having the matters tried together.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.