Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 So. 2d 1047 - Foreman v. State

400 So. 2d 1047 - Foreman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2000

8 state decisions

50198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bram v. United States · 107 So. 2d 16 - Frazier v. State · Deeb v. Division of Administration, State, Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"must not be extracted by any sort of threats or violence, nor obtained by any direct or implied promises, however slight, nor by the exertion of any improper influence... . A confession can never be received in evidence where the prisoner had been influenced by any threat or promise; for the law cannot measure the force of the influence used, or decide upon its effect upon the mind of the prisoner, and therefore excludes the declaration if any degree of influence has been exerted."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The confession must be excluded if “the attending circumstances, or the declarations of those present at the making of the confession, are calculated to delude the prisoner as to his true position, or to exert improper or undue influence over his mind.” Frazier v. State, 107 So.2d 16 (Fla.1958).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.