400 So. 2d 1048 - Suarez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 397 So. 2d 1033 - State v. Pezzella · 297 So. 2d 836 - Brennan v. RYTER · Bloom v. State · 291 So. 2d 262 - Booze v. State · 71 Ill. App. 3d 52 - People v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A statement of the specific crime being committed and a statement of the objects to be seized are separate (warrant) requirements... . [T]he leaving blank of the lines provided to describe the items to be seized, is a failure to describe such items at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.