Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

400 So. 2d 812

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1981-06-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1982

1 state decisions

Relies on 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · State Ex Rel. Pensacola News-Journal, Inc. v. Fleet · C. D. W. v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1These consolidated appeals have been brought by appellant who was charged by indictment with sexual battery and attempted sexual battery. He pleaded guilty to both counts and was placed on probation for a term of seven years on each charge to run concurrently. A condition of the probation was that he enter and satisfactorily complete the mentally disordered sex offender program.

¶2After appellant had spent approximately one year in the program the agency reported, to the trial court that it had exhausted treatment under the program and that appellant had violated the terms of his probation. Upon due and proper hearings the court revoked his probation and sentenced him to thirty years in the state penitentiary under each of the two counts.

¶3*813Appellant seeks to vacate the order of probation and the sentence imposed following the revocation of probation based on the ground that they were unlawfully entered.

¶4We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs in the light of appellant’s contentions and have concluded that reversible error has not been made to appear. Williamson v. State, 379 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1980); King v. State, 373 So.2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Smith v. State, 345 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 353 So.2d 678 (Fla.1977); Brown v. State, 305 So.2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

¶5Affirmed.

/400/so2d/812 · .json · Public domain