Foster v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1991
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 172 Tex. Crim. 403 - Ex Parte Meyer · 171 Tex. Crim. 425 - Hultin v. State · Garza v. State · 72 Tex. Crim. 83 - Ex Parte Marshall · 245 F. Supp. 55 - Sawyer v. Hauck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““no notice that the act would provide that male defendants over 17 and females over 18 years of age would no longer be subject to but would be exempt from such penal laws and criminal prosecution if they were under 16 years of age at the time they committed the crime.” 400 S.W.2d 557 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whaley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.