Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 U.S. 517 - Donaldson v. United States

Donaldson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

2,453
cited by 2,453 later decisions
41
cited 41 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

1,139 federal appellate · 285 district · 102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,453 later decisions (41 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Upjohn Company v. United States (1981), Church of Scientology of California v. United States (1992)

1,139 federal appellate · 285 district · 102 state decisions — followed in 23 states

9780197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Powell · Jenkins v. McKeithen · Hannah v. Larche · Gotthelf v. Commissioner

Cited together with United States v. Powell · United States v. National Bank · Reisman v. Caplin · Couch v. United States · Trbovich v. United Mine Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,453 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would thwart and defeat the appropriate investigatory powers that the Congress has placed in 'the Secretary or his delegate.'”
    166 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant’s interest is adequately represented by existing parties.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.