Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 400 U.S. 74 - Dutton v. Evans

Dutton v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

4,059
cited by 4,059 later decisions
84
cited 84 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

1,487 federal appellate · 94 district · 1,866 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4,059 later decisions (84 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Crawford v. Washington (2004), Ohio v. Roberts (1980)

1,487 federal appellate · 94 district · 1,866 state decisions — followed in 49 states

1.6k0197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedAlex S. Evans v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3771 · 28 U.S.C. § 1254 · 28 U.S.C. § 1732

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green

Cited together with California v. Green · Ohio v. Roberts · Bruton v. United States · Pointer v. Texas · Chapman v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4,059 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accuracy of the truth-determining process.”
    204 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If it hadn't been for that dirty son-of-a-bitch Alex Evans, we wouldn't be in this now.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court finding that admission of the statement violated appellee's right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment. The Supreme Court, however, reversed the court of appeals holding that the out-of-court statement was admissible since it bore indicia of reliability that fully warranted its placement before the jury. The Supreme Court recognized, as has this Court, that”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.