Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 F.2d 464 - Ross v. Odom

Ross v. Odom’s Empirical Analysis

401 F.2d 464 · 1968

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
May 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2022

5 federal appellate ·

401968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 101 · 26 U.S.C. § 401 (Self-Employed Individuals Tax Retirement Act of 1962) · 26 U.S.C. § 79

Relies on Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co. · Helvering v. Le Gierse · Haynes v. United States · Estate of H. H. Weinert, Deceased, Jane W. Blumberg, and Hilda B. Weinert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · United States v. Cocke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * this arrangement not only satisfies risk-shifting, risk-distributing, it does so in a binding enforceable way with death irretrievably liquidating a determinable obligation which can be paid in fact through ample funds collected, segregated, invested and husbanded under severe restrictions which assure both availability and sufficiency of the funds to discharge the obligation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the payor's estate or beneficiaries will be paid a certain amount upon his death regardless of whether the amount is more or less than decedent has paid into the fund.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.