United States v. Lipowitz’s Empirical Analysis
401 F.2d 591 · 1968
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The facts presented in the instant appeal materially differ from the facts and holding in Bruton . Here, the entire testimony of the witness was stricken and the jury specifically instructed to disregard it as to all defendants. In Bruton , the testimony was received into evidence, allowing the jury to weigh its credibility and impact for a limited purpose, but not allowing the incriminated defendant his constitutional right to impugn the source of the testimony through cross-examination. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““* * * to determine if they could recognize any of the men in the courtroom.” Id. at 591 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.