Guttman v. Khalsa’s Empirical Analysis
401 F.3d 1170 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Pennzoil Company v. Texaco Inc · Johnson v. De Grandy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). 1 Guttman is a doctor who formerly was licensed to practice in New Mexico. He also suffers from depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. In December 1999, the Impaired Physicians Committee ("Committee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guttman v. Khalsa“) directed Guttman to appear before it in response to a series of complaints about Guttman's professional conduct. The Committee issued a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guttman v. Khalsa“) of the New Mexico Board of Medical Examiners (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Guttman v. Khalsa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.