Amend v. Properties Llc’s Empirical Analysis
401 F.3d 1255 · 2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Browning v. Peyton · Management Search, Inc. v. Kinard · 243 Ga. App. 584 - Perimeter Realty v. Gapi, Inc. · 145 Ga. App. 672 - Sharp-Boylston Co. v. Lundeen · Padgett v. Silver Lake Park Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Georgia Supreme Court has never adopted this `procuring cause' element of a quantum meruit claim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`unlawful for any person, firm, partnership association, copartnership, or corporation ... to engage in the business ... of a real estate broker ... within any county in [Georgia] having a population of 44,195 or more [under the 1920 U.S. census]....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Brokerage Relationship in Real Estate Transactions Act[ ], as amended in 2000, foreclose [s] a broker from seeking a common-law remedy (i.e.,[ ] quantum meruit) when no written engagement agreement has been executed?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.