Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 F.3d 1273 - Padgett v. Donald

Padgett v. Donald’s Empirical Analysis

401 F.3d 1273 · 2005

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
11
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Boxer X v. Harris (2006), 976 So. 2d 109 - State v. Lee (2008)

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 11 states

550200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Roe v. Wade · Hudson v. Palmer · Turner v. Safley · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and storing their DNA profiles, given prisoners' reduced expectation of privacy in their identities....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Although reasonableness in most criminal cases depends on the government's obtaining a warrant supported by probable cause, the Supreme Court has emphasized `the longstanding principle that neither a warrant nor probable cause, nor, indeed, any measure of individualized suspicion, is an indispensable component of reasonableness in every circumstance.' Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656, 665 , 109 S.Ct. 1384, 1390 , 103 L.Ed.2d 685 (1989); accord Skinner, 489 U.S. at 624 , 109 S.Ct. at 1417 (`[A] showing of individualized suspicion is not a constitutional floor, below which a search must be presumed unreasonable.').”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Ferguson and Edmond struck down suspicionless searches because they vindicated no special need distinguishable from general law enforcement. However, the searches they discussed were performed on free persons, not incarcerated felons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.