Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 F.3d 411 - Gilbert v. Ferry

Gilbert v. Ferry’s Empirical Analysis

401 F.3d 411 · 2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Gould, Inc. v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann · United States v. Owens · Executive Arts Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids · Dubuc v. Michigan Board of Law Examiners · Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs had an adequate opportunity to raise their constitutional challenge, as evidenced by the fact that their lengthy brief in support of their motion to recuse contained the same arguments and proofs as presented in their complaint filed in federal court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no power to remove and re-assign cases, but rather works solely under the supervision and direction of the Michigan Supreme Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.