Walker v. True’s Empirical Analysis
401 F.3d 574 · 2005
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
August 2011
most recently cited
7 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Townsend v. Sain · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Mims v. Browning Manufacturing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the merits of the factual dispute were not resolved in the state hearing; (2) the state factual determination is not fairly supported by the record as a whole; (3) the fact-finding procedure employed by the state court was not adequate to afford a full and fair hearing; (4) there is a substantial allegation of newly discovered evidence; (5) the material facts were not adequately developed at the state-court hearing; or (6) for any reason it appears that the state trier of fact did not afford the habeas applicant a full and fair fact hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in state court'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robinson v. Polk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.