Moore v. Newell’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1991
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Thornhill v. Alabama · United States v. Harriss · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · Smith v. Goguen · Lanzetta v. State New Jersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“but for threatening to picket for the purpose of extorting a payment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the threat to picket or picketing itself cannot be used by labor officials to extort money in return for `labor peace.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Robertson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.