Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 ILLAPP3D 543 - People v. Danielle T.

People v. Danielle T.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 235 Ill. 2d 21 - Blum v. Koster · 195 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Hall · 395 Ill. App. 3d 1063 - People v. Hodges · 179 Ill. 2d 184 - In Re AP · 231 Ill. 2d 241 - People v. P.W.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Previous statements made by the minor relating to any allegations of abuse or neglect shall be admissible in evidence. However, no such statement, if uncorroborated and not subject to cross-examination, shall be sufficient in itself to support a finding of abuse or neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he children's statements were also corroborated when they described the physical acts of sexual abuse committed on the children in a detailed fashion that would be unexpected of children of their age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “agree[d] with the trial court that the children's statements of sexual abuse corroborated each other's statements and those statements make it more probable that the children were abused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.