State v. Aliberti’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Raphan v. United States · Patton v. United States · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Porter v. States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ineffective assistance claims will be allowed on direct appeal only when the representation was so casual that the trial record evidences a manifest usurpation of appellant's constitutional rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sonen · State v. Petersen“it will not consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Petersen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.