Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 P.2d 189 - High v. State

High v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. California · 94 Okla. Crim. 45 - Henderson v. State · 59 Okla. Crim. 146 - Kennamer v. State · Gonzales v. State · Whisenhunt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where evidence is urged by defendant on motion for new trial on the ground the same is newly discovered, it must be established that the same, if exisiting at the time of trial, could not have been procured before trial by the exercise of due diligence and failure to do so constitutes a bar to a new trial on such ground.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In Oklahoma a nonexpert witness may give his opinion as to whether or not a man is insane where it is shown that such witness has had sufficient opportunity for observation of the accused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.