Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 P.3d 39 - Schnitker v. State

Schnitker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney · United States v. Virginia · 116 S. Ct. 712 - Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Financial Corp. · Hooks v. Ohio · Downs v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[H]ad the jury found that defendant acted in self-defense on the underlying felonies submitted, it could not have found defendant guilty of felony murder. . . . [T]he purpose of the felony murder rule is to deter even accidental killings from occurring during the commission of a dangerous felony. To allow self-defense, perfect or imperfect, to apply to felony murder would defeat that purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We agree with the majority of jurisdictions that have addressed this issue and conclude that self-defense is not available to a defendant who kills while engaged in the perpetration of an enumerated felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In matters of first impression, we look to other jurisdictions for guidance,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.