Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 S.C. 82 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Draper v. United States · New York v. Belton · United States v. Robinson · Horton v. California · Arizona v. Gant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Warrantless searches and seizures are unreasonable absent a recognized exception to the warrant requirement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing a Fourth Amendment search and seizure case, an appellate court must affirm the trial court's ruling if there is any evidence to support it; the appellate court may reverse only for clear error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Florida v. Jimeno , 500 U.S. 248 , 250, 111 S.Ct. 1801 , 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991). The exclusionary rule is a deterrent sanction by which the prosecution is barred from introducing evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. State v. Brown , 401 S.C. 82 , 88, 736 S.E.2d 263 , 266 (2012) (citing Davis v. United States , 564 U.S. 229 , 231, 131 S.Ct. 2419 , 180 L.Ed.2d 285 (2011) ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.