Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 401 So. 2d 148 - Crane v. State

401 So. 2d 148 - Crane v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2016

18 state decisions

1001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Radke v. State · 52 Ala. App. 397 - Radke v. State · 44 Ala. App. 559 - Livingston v. State · 56 Ala. App. 613 - Tooson v. State · 340 So. 2d 1144 - Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constructive possession may be determined by weighing facts tending to support a defendant's necessary control over the substances against facts which demonstrate a lack of dominion and control.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ctual or potential physical control, (2) intention to exercise dominion and (3) external manifestations of intent and control.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"In McCord v. State , Ala. Cr. App., 373 So.2d 1242 (1979), constructive possession was proved by an officer testifying that: (1) he knew of his own personal knowledge that the accused resided at the residence, (2) he saw letters in the house addressed to the accused at that address, and (3) he observed the accused dress with clothes from the closet in the bedroom where the contraband was found."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.