401 So. 2d 185 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 29 Ala. App. 349 - Wilkins v. State · 57 Ala. App. 529 - McDonald v. State · 29 Ala. App. 399 - Robertson v. State · 369 So. 2d 863 - Weatherford v. State · 369 So. 2d 873 - Leonard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with a value in excess of $25.00 must be classified as theft of property in the second degree. This argument is without merit, since this court has previously affirmed an accused's conviction for theft of property in the first degree where the value of the property taken was shown to exceed $1,000.00 and where the property was taken from a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parker v. State“(t)he defendant's involvement or guilt of such other transactions need not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for such evidence to be admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.